Convention institutions EN
From Noeuconstitution
Contents |
QUESTION 2 : WHICH INSTITUTIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC EUROPE ?
During the Attac convention meeting in Brussels (17-18 December 2005), 4 different basic approaches/models were identified. It was not possible, at this stage, to clearly identify a global preference of one model compared to another. Nevertheless, discussions focused mainly on model 2 and 3 for which a list of 7 concrete common propositions was initiated. This list is detailed here after.
A. Different models for the European institutions
| Title of the proposition | Comments and discussions | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Model n°1 : first create democracy, then think about institutions
| Low convergence. On the contrary, there is convergence that ATTAC should work on an alternative for the institutions.
There is convergence about the lack of democracy but this approach is better taken into account in the third part of the report (« What Europe do we want? », and is a more long-term debate. |
| 2 | Model n°2 : Reforming the decision making between the European Parliament and the Council
| Model 2 and model 3 agree on a list of concrete proposals that are presented hereunder.
For example, the fact that when the Council is acting as a legislative body, its deliberations and decisions must be public. |
| 3 | Model n°3 : Moving towards a fully democratic European Parliament and a European Government, abolishing the role of the Council
| Model 2 and model 3 agree on a list of concrete proposals that are presented hereunder. |
| 4 | Model n°4 : Pan-European intergovernmental model of European co-operation (UN-type), including all European countries
|
B. Common propositions (model n°1 and n°2)
| Title of the proposition | Comments and discussions | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | European central bank :
| Convergence. |
| 2 | Legislative proposals : European laws will be adopted on the basis of proposals from
| Convergence. |
| 3 | Power of the European Parliament :
| Convergence on codecision power. Other points need further discussion. |
| 4 | Tax policies : Tax policies will be adopted on the basis of qualified majority voting procedures. | |
| 5 | Involvement of national parliaments : National parliaments will be involved in the decision making process of the EU, through one of the following methods :
if a quarter of member states national parliaments reject a draft legislature proposal, the proposal will have to be re-writen. all national parliaments will make known their assesment of draft legislative proposal before they are submitted to the EU decision making process. A second chamber comprised of delegates of national parliaments will be set-up and the council will be accountable to it. | Involvement of national parliaments will not solve all democratic problems. The relation between national parliaments and citizens must also be improved. More citizen participation can be a clue (see next proposition). |
| 6 | Citizens participation :
5 or 10 million citizens from a significant number of membre states will be able to demand a European referendum on a proposal.
Participatory democracy as objective in the re-evaluation of representative democracy. | |
| 7 | Economic democracy :
| (This is maybe more a topic for the third question : « What Europe do we want? ») |
Other propositions which came from the session « What Europe do we want? »
| Title of the proposition | Comments and discussions | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | What could be an ideal democracy:
Having discussions about what an ideal democracy would mean (relation of institutions and policies) | (Cf. model 1 of question 2)
Link between economic organisation (capitalism) and real level of democracy : - people don't really have time to involve in public affairs - capitalism creates too much corporate power, against which political institutions become powerless |
| 9 | The creation of a real European public space (political parties, public opinion and trade unions) | |
| 10 | Tackle the lobby problem. | In one group strong convergence and top priority |
| 11 | Possibility to withdraw your vote : more control on elected people. If you are disappointed by somebody you elected, you cant take him back his mandate. (E.g.: new Venezuelan constitution) | Point to clarify in the future, a new idea; needs further discussion and elaboration. Low strategic importance. |

